No time to die(4.5/5) — No spoiler

No time to die is the latest James Bond film and the last of Daniel Craig era. It would be very difficult to talk about this movie without spoilers. So I decided to write two reviews into two separate versions. The non-spoiler version which you are reading now and the full spoiler version which will come out very soon.

Overall, the film has maintained high production value. Daniel Craig is excellent as usual and the action scenes are much better than Spectre. But the most interesting thing for me in this film is the story, this is the one with the most ambitious storytelling of the franchise. Several Bond tropes are still there but it broke away from several traditions which add a few new twists to the story. It holds nothing back and makes this a grand finale that Craig version of Bond deserves.


Do not read any spoilers before seeing this movie. You definitely need to go in blind for this one.

There are two standout newcomers in this movie: Lashana Lynch as Nomi and Ana De Armas as Paloma. Nomi served as a competitor of Bond and prove to be quite badass and definitely the most competent Black woman ally by far. Paloma; however, served as a straight ‘sexy girl’ ally. She has fewer screens by comparison but Ana De Armas carried her energy through every scene she was in. I like both characters and hope to see their return in the next film of the franchise in some fashion.


Rami Malek as Safin is pretty chilling although slightly a bit underused. His plan is horrifying but his motivation is not quite clear and sounds a bit silly. While bad guy silliness is part of Bond movie charm and most villain motivation like Dr. No(whom Safin take inspiration from) are undercook, it does not quite match the serious tone of the Craig series. That’s being said, it was still less silly than “I hate you adoptive bro” that we have in Spectre.


As for those who return from Spectre, Lea Seydoux as Madeleine Swann redeems herself in this movie. While she’s not on Eva Green or late Dame Diana Rigg’s level, her chemistry with Craig is much better and she was able to portray more range of emotion than the last one. Christoph Waltz as Blofeld is also a bit more intimidating this time. He might not be the main villain this time around but he is able to make the most of his screen. I don’t think he is as good as Donald Pleasence(You Are Only Live Twice) or Terry Salveras(On Her Majesty secret service) version but it’s still an improvement.


There are not many faults that I found in the movie. Aside from the villain’s motivation, the only thing that I feel at odd is the length of the film. While it was quite entertaining and I can’t think of a scene that should be cut, I wonder if a James Bond film should be almost three hours long. It’s not a deal-breaker but I hope that the next film could tidy it up a bit.


Overall, I think that this is a solid movie. The ending will split James Bond fandom in a decade to come but I believe it will be remembered more fondly in the future. All in all, for now, I think this is the best send-off that any Bond actor can have.


And I can’t wait to see what comes next.


Picture Reference: https://www.007.com/no-time-to-die-announcement/

Mulan 2020 (1.5/5)

I first read a story of Hua Mulan when I was a kid. It was from the one of the picture book of historical story in China. The story is very simple and doesn’t strike me at odd. Basically, it was about a woman who fight in a war instead of her elderly father. She was capable enough to survive the war and reveal her identity to her comrade thereafter. I thought it is cool, very normal, and not a big deal back then.

I watch Disney’s animation version of Mulan several years later. I like the movie but I don’t take it as a big deal. It’s a good movie, but it’s not one of my “all time fave”. It’s probably revolutionary for the westerner to see kick ass Asian woman. However, I was born in Southeast Asian and those character are not uncommon in Asian media. So Disney Mulan is just another cool lady protagonist that I saw million of time in Anime and Chinese’s Wuxia(aka. period martial art movie). However, I did appreciate that Disney take Chinese story and make it to something beautiful.

My thought on Mulan shift a lot once I move to US. It was slow but I realized that there are not many positive Asian female role model in American media. They are either villainous, hooker or one dimensional love interest. Disney’s Mulan stand shine above others for several reason. She’s courage, have a strong family value, and most important of all: being able to stand to tell her own story.

So when Disney decide to remade their Mulan into live action movie, I’m pretty excited. Casting Liu Yifei was sound like a good idea back then. On hindsight, she’s a good casting on paper. She was living in USA in her childhood so she probably can speak English better than other Mainland Chinese actor. She’s been in a few Hollywood movie and have name recognition in Asian country so she might draw some money there. Plus, she have an experience in Wuxia and Chinese period drama so she probably need less training on those department. While she’s well known for typecast as playing emotionless girl like Xiao Longnu and got criticize for not emote well, I believe that can be fix a bit with good script and directing. Having Donny Yen, Jet Li, and Gong Li is good as well. I was happy for the casting.

And then this movie become a mess.

Now. after a long prologue, I like to address some of those controversies of this movie before hand. Yes, Liu Yifei comment on Hong Kong is awful. Yes, the whole Xinjiang incident is horrible. There’s a lot of problem of this movie but I will focus on the movie itself, not on what controversies behind it.

Let’s start with something positive.

For me, the best thing of this movie is the costume design. As a longtime Chinese period watcher, I think it’s look accurate enough. The change of the enemy ethnicity from Huns to Rourans is also more accurate to the original source. I also appreciate that Mulan to live in Tulou. Although it felt weird at first, I appreciated it for showing a few architecture that I never seen before in other Chinese series.

Most of veteran actor like Gong Li, Tzi Ma, Donnie Yen, and Jet Li did their job pretty well. Their character is not exceptional but I think they put a bit of work in very little they have. I don’t have anything to mention of Liu Yifei though. She’s emote a bit more than usual but still in her stoic face most of the time. I don’t think she’s too horrible for the script she has but her character is definitely more boring than the animated counterpart.

I also think that the fight choreography is also pretty well done except for some move. It’s not extraordinary and there’s a few speed up but I thinks it’s pretty decent. I appreciate that Mulan actually have a fight scene along with a scene where she use a sniping and decoy tactic. I think many might feel that all those acrobatic choreograph is a bit over the top. However, this adaptation is leaning on Wuxia and supernatural side so this is very normal by Chinese movie standard.

As for the thing I feel at odd. Well, there’s quite a lot.

First thing is that all of the character are somewhat boring and uninspiring. As I mention before, Mulan came out pale in comparison of her animated version. All of the other character are not interesting either. The veteran act well but the script is clearly lacking the finish touch. All the side character aside from that are very forgettable, not well establish, and the script make them act like borderline asshole. Among all those character, Gong Li’s character is arguably the only memorable one of the bunch but that might be my bias.

Second is that this movie is CRIMINALLY abuse Chinese philosophy, especially the conceptof Chi. On basic term in real life, Chi (or Qi) is a life force that is in everyone. Chi in this movie; however, is some magical force that mostly appear in men. Woman who have Chi in this movie must hide their power other they will be accuse of witchcraft and cast out as an outcast. I know that almost every Wuxia and Xianxia(aka. Chinese fantasy movie) have some unrealistic take on chi but this is probably one of the worst. Basic concept of Chi doesn’t have anything to do with gender but this movie try to add a gender twist on it for weird reason. Saying that most woman don’t have Chi and those who have should hide it is absurd as saying that woman don’t have blood circulation and those who do should not breath. It doesn’t make sense.

The weird concept of Chi on this movie is also very inconsistency between character. The script can’t seems to make their mind on whether they want to make their Chi a kungfu power or magical power. It seems to be a kungfu power on Mulan and arguably other men but downright magic for Gong Li’s character. It doesn’t make any sense. I also dislike the fact that they use Chi as a reason that Mulan is innately powerful without doing work. It’s like telling people that they can get strong without go to gym.

Not a good message.

Aside from abusing the concept of Chi, several Chinese idiom also wildly misrepresent and doesn’t make sense. The repeat chant of “Honor”, “Loyalty, brave, and true” are vague and very meaningless. I personally found their use of “four ounce can move thousand pound” to be the most offensive.

If half-heart character and McDojo snake oil philosophy are not bad enough, the film also have one last poison. It misunderstand the message of Mulan story. By all means, all Mulan stories are a feminist story. It’s a story about a woman who prove that they can be competent as being a soldier as man does. However, there’s a key difference in this adaptation that make it pale beyond comparison of other.

That difference is that this movie do not understand the message of original adaption and push the oppression tone further than it could handle. The original Mulan ballad and Disney adaptation is a feminist but not anti-patriarchy since it was not portray as harmful and Mulan herself is serving under patriarchy. However, this movie was full of anti-patriarchy message for at least for the first half of the movie. While it’s not wrong to put anti-patriarchy in any movie, and it can be remarkable story if apply it right, that doesn’t happen in this one. The tone shift do not match well with the story.

I would like to point Disney original to show why.

In Disney original, the gender role restriction that Mulan has are base more on tradition and harmless personal bias. It was an obstacle, but a non-lethal one. Her family might expected her to be a bit more ‘traditional’ but they are not exactly force it into her throat. They console her when she mess up the funny matchmaking incident. While Li Shang look down on Mulan, it could be argue that it was not out of malice but more to the gender role conception he has. All those misogyny are not treat as seriously so we don’t view the male character as an asshole. When her comrade disguise themselves as a woman to infiltrate the palace, we learn that the expectancy to gender role do not matter. Everyone learn their lesson and move on.

In this version; however, Mulan was downright persecute for being a woman. Her father forbid her to do Kungfu because of weirdo sexist Chi discrimination when she was a kid. He also monologue that Men and world of men are danger to Mulan. The villain is a downright misogynist who compares Xian Lang(Gong Li’s character) to a dog. Her commander threaten to execute her. She doesn’t have much relation with her comrade. Even her sorta love-interest act like a stalker who get a little bit too close for comfort. None of male character are likable. They are all under patriarchy and oppress Mulan to find her self-identity. In fact, the ONLY person who encourage her to be herself is Xian Lang, who suppose to be her enemy. The message is clear. Patriarchy society is a clear threat to Mulan’s life and arguably more than the invader itself.

With these different level of misogyny in this movie, it wouldn’t work if this adaptation have the same ending as the Disney ending. Every fairy tale need clarity at the end. If Mulan is oppressed more, she must fight harder. Perhaps this movie want to give a stronger message. A message on how to improve our decrease misogyny in society.

However, the message flop as the movie come into similar conclusion. While the Khan die at the end, the patriarchy still stand. Everyone accept her as a badass, but none learn any lesson.

And to twist the knife further, while original Disney Mulan just go back home and live her life free. This version; however, might rejoin the emperor’s bodyguard. It would be a good message for female enlistment if not for a minor detail. Unlike the original which all the character improve their mindset on woman, the man in this movie remain the same. They remain the same because the script don’t let them change. Therefore, the emperor’s call to service might not be a call for improvement for woman.

But it’s a call for a woman to serve a same patriarchy that doesn’t treat woman well instead. In some sense, I would say it doesn’t satisfy the message. Why make it super anti-patriarchy if it’s going to end in compromise?

In conclusion, story of Hua Mulan is a feminist story but it doesn’t work well as a anti-patriarchy establishment piece that the writer of this movie might intend. It’s a failure because the team do not understand the culture or the source that they adapted from. They remove a few positive part like Mushu and the humor and then add a few sloppy idea on it own along with half bake, self-interpreted Chinese idiom. What we have left is McChinese dish with a nice package. The box looks good but it taste even horrible because all the extra ingredient doesn’t mix well with original recipe.

It’s not unwatchable but I can’t recommend this movie at all. There’s a lot of other live action version of Mulan elsewhere and I’m sure that at least one of them might be better than this.

Picture reference:

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4566758/mediaviewer/rm3506086401/

Ugly American(4/5, 4.5/5 For Thai People)

When I left Thailand seven years ago,  I found myself in a middle of culture shock and in need of a companion who understands me. At first, I have several Thai friends but we become separate by life choices and circumstance. As time goes by, list of my Thai friend become lessen and list of American friends become bigger. Life is nice enough but once in awhile, I got a random headache on culture gap. Hollywood never intend to represent Asian people as a full develop people like most American hero have. From the films like ‘Anna and the King’, to ‘Hangover’ and recently ‘No Escape’, American media can only represent my country and Southeast Asia as a whole as an ‘exotic weird place where weird and maybe violent people live’.

I understand well that movie is just a movie. But from what I see in my life, most people don’t understand that movie don’t reflect on real life. They want to stick the stereotype in their head and don’t care for anything less. I even got into a stranger (a woman) who refers to my home country as ‘capital of prostitute’ once. I do wish that we got to represent the right way. As a full human being who capable of both goodness and evil for once. But with all those whitewashing and weird treatment that Hollywood gives to Asian actors/actresses on these two years, I doubt that it would ever happen.

Until I discovered this movie.

Ugly American is a loose adaptation of a novel of the same name. It tells a story of Harrison MacWhite, a newly appointed US ambassador to fictional Southeast Asian country of Sarkhan(dub in Thai as ‘Sara Khan’ – Fun fact). Sarkhan is in political turmoil when rural people plot against US-fund creation of ‘Freedom’ road. One of them is MacWhite best friend, Deong (Eiji Okada), who protest in a ground that the project is a waste of money and provide no benefit to the country. These two men will come to clash as the friendship might not survive the political struggle.

Marlon Brando is terrific as MacWhite. He is the most interesting take on the ‘White guy in a foreign country’. MacWhite has a bit of mighty whitey character type but what difference is that he actually cares about the country and his friendship with Deong. The film also makes it clear that he cannot blend in and understand the local issue and only have the solution that comes from a USA-centric mindset which might not benefit the local. More importantly, he got pushed around by cercumstance that beyond his control and never become a local leader(or second-in-command like The Last Samurai) which is very refreshing in my opinion.

vlcsnap-2011-08-08-22h10m26s40

Eiji Okada is also good as Deong. Unlike other ‘Asian best friend’ character in this type of movie, Deong definitely not a sidekick character. He has his character arc, understandable motivation, and not without a fault. While he understands the local issue and means well for his country, he is the least political savvy of the group and only good at being a freedom fighter. You can see these kinds of people even today.

Eiji_Okada_in_The_Ugly_American_trailer

Also, as a Thai. I couldn’t write about this movie without mention the ‘true star’ of this film (on least on my bias as a Thai people). Kukrit Pramoj as Prime Minister Kwen Sai. This gentleman, a sage, a political figure, and a future Prime Minister of Thailand, does his job pretty well. With no acting experience, his acting might not be Oscar worthy. However, being an equal footing when in the same scene with flicking MARLON BRANDO is definitely a feat that not many actors can claim either.

kukrit

Nonetheless, the film has a small issue. It heavily relies on exposition which slows the pace a bit. Still, it is necessary for this info dump to be there otherwise no one would understand the film.

All in all, this is a film that exists before their time. I’m very surprised and find it embarrassing that a film in 1963 can offer much more relevant and accurate perspective view about Southeast Asian more than the one that made in 2016!!! It might not be 100% accurate since the real politics is much messier but it’s definitely the best depiction that I ever saw.

A must see. I cannot recommend more of this movie.

IT(3/5)

IT is an adaptation of a movie with a same name by Stephen King. The film told the story of a “Losers club”, a group of boys and one girl who investigate and must face Pennywise, the clown monster.

That’s sum up pretty much about the film. I believe that the novel probably inspire some of “Young boy went for hometown adventure” film like  Stranger Things. I have little doubt that similar story have been retell, rewrote, and repackage many time.

But why is this film is even worth of a remake. We definitely hear it all before. We have a bunch of loser kid who bond over the film and fight some ‘monster’. I could even said that it’s a plot of Power Ranger 2017 for crying out loud!

There are a lot of reason to be sure. Either from lack of original idea, or nostalgic dream of 80’s American lifestyle that are soon to be extinct. Regardless, I would say that this is one of the remake that worth watching.

As a guy who didn’t watch a the original, I would say that the film stand out on it own just fine. Actors are good. Effect are okay. And Bill Skarsgard who plays Pennywise is doing a great job.

However, the things I like the most from the film is that it takes time to focus on each of the kids. This is not a film where monster lurk around and give us jump scare in every 5 minutes. Because the scariest ‘monster’ in this movie is not Pennywise, but the obstacle and fear which they have in their life. Therefore, we needs to know each one of them. We see how they live, have a crush, dealing with puberty, bickering, fight with each other. Each one of the kids have some tough life, fears, and hardship that needs to get through. Some needs approval from their parent. Some was abuse by their parent. Even the bullies. They all have obstacle that they need to get through.

This plays well into a screen writing since Pennywise loves to play with fear. Each time that Pennywise appear to each kids, It’s not random. It’s always something that personal to each kid. They need to choose whether they can fight their fear and ‘be good’ to fight Pennywise like Loser club or they can submit to their fear and become a tool to be used like the bullies.

And when the Loser club can get rid of their fear, Pennywise is not so scary anymore.

 

<Spoiler Note:>

Personally, there is one flaw in the script that I don’t think  flow very well with ‘conquer your fear’ theme of the movie. Beverly(the only girl in the group) problem was that she was sexually abuse by her own father and she ‘solve’ it by committing patricide in self defense. However, there are also other bullies character who become Pennywise’s goon by murder his abusive father in his sleep. The former is definitely more justified than the latter but it does feels a bit odd that the script implied that ‘act of violence’ is also a viable solution for conquer your fear.

 

Also. After reading book summary from wikipedia, I must said that I’m glad that they delete the ‘sex scene’ from the book. It would fuck the narrative so bad that I wouldn’t even want to write the review.

Blue Valentine(3.5/5)

Blue Valentine is a story of couple name Dean(Ryan Gosling) and Cindy(Michelle William) who are near the end of the marriage life. The film have shifting back and forth between the present and the past where they just met.

While story is simple, the acting and script is solid and authentic. Since the film was more focus on storytelling than the story itself, it’s rely on the actor to sell the work. Fortunately for us, both Gosling and Williams carried the film well. They looked authentic and work well on the material that they have.

Overall, I think that this is a good film but might worth seeing several time by any couple. It was clear that both Dean and Cindy relation are doom from the start. Both of them met when they were pretty young and immature. They married when they are barely know of each other which doesn’t lead to a solid start. Relationship should start slow then it can grow strong. It’s seems like good lesson for any people who’s looking to be in a relationship.

Death Note 2017

Just watch American version of Death Note. It’s not good but I wouldn’t say it’s really bad or offensive either.
 

 

Gotta say though that the feels of this movie are way more different than original. The original was a mind game and social commentary while this version was more of a teenage grade-B horror movie. The characters in this film are not behaving like their original counterpart. Light; for example, lost some of his cunning and psychopathic but this was transfer to his girlfriend Mia(Misa in original) instead.

 

There still some entertaining you can get on the film though. The cinematography is decent and I got a few chuckle from Nat Wolff facial expression. Sadly we don’t have hilarious chip eating or swimming scene like the original.

 

I would go so far to say that this is much more enjoyable than Iron Fist as long as you don’t compare it with original manga.

 

2/5. Worth watching with friend on a beer on boring night and laugh your ass of.

Dunkirk (4.5/5)

Dunkirk (4.5/5)

 

================================================================

War movie, no matter how good it is, it always has one problem.

By their own nature, war movie are always about decisive conflict between two sides of human political parties.

American and British Empire.

White American and Native Indian.

Allied and Nazi.

Good and evil?

To the audience, when one side is good the other one must be bad. No matter how sympathetic they try to make the ‘bad guy’ are, we will always pick who’s good and bad based on our life and experience.  In reality, war and conflict are much more complicated but no matter how hard anyone try it never really work. In my opinion, no director can tell how complicate war really was in cinema. Quentin Tarantino might (unintentionally) try to put some grey a bit in Inglorious Bastard, where the Bastard are sadistic Allied commando, but we always know who that Nazi is a bad guy. American Sniper might try to portray Chris Kyle as a family man and PTSD survivor, but we also know that it’s a story about US Marine badass who fight evil Arab.

No matter to how hard someone might try, war movie will always be about ‘good’ vs ‘evil’. Simple as that.

Until ‘Dunkirk’ shows up.

Dunkirk is a movie that based on a true story about Dunkirk evacuation in World War II. Where the British soldiers were push back to the beach of Dunkirk and facing disastrous evacuation. The film shifts back and forth between three stories with DIFFERENT perspective of times.

The first story (the mole) was from on infantry perspective as he struggle to evacuate back and forth between Dunkirk beach and the sea.

It expands about 1 week.

The mole
The second story (the sea) was based from volunteer evacuation ship. The crew must made decision and faced their fear as they had to continue their mission along with keeping PTSD stricken soldier (Cillian Murphy) at bay.
This story expands about 1 day.
The sea
The last one(the Air) is a story about a pilot (Tom Hardy- who once again played a ‘guy with a mask with British(?) accent’ role) , who has to shoot down German bombers before they reached Dunkirk while running out of fuel.
This story expands about 1 hour.
The sky
As you can see here, the script timing makes the film a remarkable in itself. Rarely (if ever) there was any film that cover multiple perspectives based on different timeframe and make it seamless like this one had done. This film was an instant classic and would be a case study for many film students to come. It was intriguing, imaginative and a sight to see for those who love cinematography and editing. I couldn’t think of any word to say on how great it is.
The two symbols
The more important however is that this film is a film that finally BREAKS the whole the war movie genre itself. This film is not about a group of soldier fighting each other.
There are NO bad guys in this war movie.
Well, technically the Nazi German/Wehrmacht is a bad guy in this movie. However, this movie went beyond making Nazi a general ‘bad guy’ war movie. You saw their destruction but you never actually see them.  You might see their plane and silhouette but you never saw their face in an entire movie. You know that they exist but you never ever seen them. Christopher Nolan removed those ‘human’ face from them. They came out and attack allied outside the screen.
They are not human….
But as we watch from the safety of the screen, we can’t say for sure that they are not monster either.  How could we identify something that we can’t see? They are not even a character. For the purpose of this movie, the German were served for something different.
They were neither man nor monster but a symbol.
A symbol of obstacle and hardship.
What about the Allied then, were they heroes? Maybe they were but they were not memorable. Not by old school war movie standard. They were heroic but somehow Christopher Nolan seem to remove something ‘extraordinary’ from them. I didn’t see Sergeant Rock and Captain Smooth. I didn’t see Cold Sniper who never misses. I didn’t see Ace pilot who could shoot five plane in a single run. Everything seems natural like I was not watching a movie but a documentary.
If the Germans were symbol, then the Allied characters were also symbols.
Symbols of humanity by themselves.
As I said earlier, this was not a movie about two human factions fighting with each other.
This is a movie about human internal struggling in a war situation.
True, it’s the German that pushed the Allied to the beach. It was the German that bombed the ship and prevented the evacuation. But this movie is (mostly) not about heroic individual. It’s about humanity facing fear and hardship.  The difficulty that the character has is NOT about the courage fighting with the  German. It’s about the courage they fight the evil that exist within their heart.
The infantries’ worst enemies were not the German troop, but their despair and selfishness. There’s a lot time of time that one of them would have better chances of survival if they left their friend. They never did.
The worst enemy of the boat crew was neither planes nor U-boats, but the uncertainty and loneliness of endless sea.  There’s also fear that come in the form of Cillian Murphy’s character who meant no harm but become mentally obstacle for them.
And lastly, the worst enemy of the pilot was not the German planes. It’s a choice between saving himself and saving other. With low fuel and a high chance to be strand in enemy territory, the pilot needs to choose between duty and his life.
Aside from last story, no one won this war stories by shooting anyone.
Another face in a crowd and a war in all of us.
All in all, this is a unique war movie that won’t show up again any time soon. It’s a strange creature in itself. It distances us from the character but somehow better for it. Aside from the boat crew, most characters were just a face in the crowd. Just another man in uniform. Someone who was so plain. So unspecial like us.
But what they did was extraordinary.
Not because of these guys had highest killing count but because of they fought their struggle and KEEP at it. Curtain will not be cut after we found accomplished or failure. Tomorrow maybe better or worst. But until the last breath, we must fight our struggle and hope for the better day.
 
For that is what human is.
That said, I like to end this review with this quote:

 

“Even though large tracts of Europe and many old and famous States have fallen or may fall into the grip of the Gestapo and all the odious apparatus of Nazi rule, we shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end. We shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, and if, which I do not for a moment believe, this island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God’s good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old.”

 – Winston Churchill.

 

Note: In case that someone might thought that I sound more ‘neutral’ to German in WWII. I don’t support any action relate to Nazi by any shape and form. Anything that I wrote is only based on I saw screenplay on this movie only.
By all mean, I’m glad that Allied won this war.
To all WWII veteran, I salute you with all my heart and soul. You fought for all of us and deserve a better world than we currently have.

Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awaken (4/5)

Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awaken (4/5)




A long time ago in a country far far away….

There was a boy who loved Star Wars. He watch the VHS version that his dad borrow from the video shop. It was a whisper of love that grown into full-time crush when he watch the special edition in the theater. From that day on, he love all Star Wars film. 

While the American are cursing prequel like it was Anti-Christ, the boy did not care. He all the film except for Attack of the Clone and Jar Jar Bink which he love a bit less. He play most of Star Wars videogame and try to read some of the sequel novel after he found out that it existed.

Then the dark time come, creator are run out of idea and the boys realized that Star Wars sequel novel is a book for nerd who have nothing else to read in his life. He decide that Star Wars end at Return of the Jedi(or was it Star Wars:Union-where Luke married a gorgeous tsundere red-head Mara Jade)

Anywho, the boy become a man with jobs and master degree. He never thought that sequel movie would happen. Little that the man know that Disney have a cunning plan to buy Lucasfilm. With JJ Abram at it helm, they have announce to film a sequel trilogy and plan to bring peace to nerd galaxy……



Before there was Abram.
I stop give a damn about Star Wars sequel five years ago.
It’s not that I don’t care about Star Wars. I seriously do. I consider myself to be quite a Star Wars nerd back then. While I didn’t read every book or hoarding myself with action figure, I do play most of the videogame and know quite a bit of what going on behind the scene of Star Wars nerddom.
Thing is there was a sequel in the past. Long story short is that George Lucas give some permission for a Del-Rey publisher to publish a story after Return of the Jedi and after hundred of authors come and gone it was quite a mess.
For some idea on how messy it get. Han and Leia got a kid who turns to darkside. Luke Skywalker got married. New Republic fight against Borg Alien then lost to Empire again 100 years later.
The last time I bother to check the Galaxy was save by a junkie who happen to have last name Skywalker. He fought Sith lord who was an old buff dude who use to hang out with Anakin. That very same Sith lord also have a Sith Twi’lek sidekick who dress like a stripper.
Hell, it’s about time……… to quit the franchise.
It is my belief that good story need to have an end. By that point it obviously clear to me that Star Wars become a franchise zombie and everybody that got hook into it will write on whatever they damn please.
So I stop give a damn about ‘sequel’.
Until JJ Abram get into the picture.
As you probably already notice, the internet went nuts after first trailer of Episode 7 came out. Everybody is excited about the film and hail it like one of a greatest achievement of a mankind. I feels a bit skeptic however. The trailers looks good but I’m not really certain on how the franchise will turn into. Disney surely want to run Star Wars as a yearly franchise, a concept that I’m not really fond of.
But now we must focus on the present. The film come out, and there is one question needs to be answer.
Is it good?
The film  review

Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awaken is a story of Rey(Daisy Ridley), the young scavenger of desert planet of Jakku. She meets a guy name Finn(John Boyega), a deserted soldier of fascist First Order. They have adventure through galaxy while being chase by Kylo Ren(Adam driver), a ruthless dark side user from the First Order.
And that’s the summary I can provide without spoiler.
The casting is solid. The wooden dialog and acting from the Prequel trilogy are gone. All of newcomer did they job perfectly. Daisy Ridley was great in her first lead role and John Boyega is very convincing in his role as Finn. Oscar Isaac as Poe Cameron, while not have much screen time like his friends, makes every scene he appear count. While his role is best summarized as ‘ace pilot’, I’m really glad to see we have one return to Star Wars universe.
The main duo
From villain side, Adam Driver gave a great performance as Kylo Ren.  While I personally thought that Kylo ‘coolness’ is debatable, he is definitely not a one-dimension character. Sadly, everybody else from the villain side is forgettable. Maybe except Supreme leader Snoke(Andy Serkis), who probably have more role in a sequel.
The only villain this film really need.
The cinematography of the film is gorgeous and the fight scene is definitely make Age of Ultron seems like a school project. However, most scenery seems to lack some exotic ‘not on earth’ feeling that always present from the old film. The Alien is there and there’s Star Wars architecture here and there but I just feels it a bit too plain and lack of wildlife. I also feels a bit disappoint on soundtrack since the film does not seems to have any unique like in six previous film. Which is pretty sad since this is only things that prequel did it better.
It’s a nitpicking of course. Not a big deal, but I just needs to mention it.
The plot of the film is ok, although I feel it a bits rush sometime.  There some part that is so cliché even by Star Wars standard and most of plot element are heavily borrowed from episode4-5.  However, the film does it best when it comes to characterization. It does not use a lot of exposition like the old film and rely heavily on cinematic queue and acting. And fortunately, with a superb acting of the main stars, the film delivers.
However, while some of them details are probably left for artistic license, I can’t help some of them are left of as sequel bait. While I neither condone nor support the ‘make film to hype the sequel’ business model that Disney is doing with Marvel cinematic universe, this unfortunately make the plot considerably weaker as a standalone film.

Overall, it’s a solid film. Force Awaken is a new fresh start in the franchise. While I’m still remain skeptical on whether Star Wars become franchise zombie again, I will be looking forward to see how it goes.

Eat Pray Love 1/5

I’m going to get flak for this…..

========================================================================

Eat, Pray, Love was adapted from a memoir of Elizabeth Gilbeth. Lizz(Julia Robert) is woman who have it all: nice job, money, and a lovely husband. Yet she still feels empty. The film chronicle her life from divorce and go along Lizz’s journey to discover herself from Italy to India and end up with love in Bali.

Sound promising, isn’t it?

Well yeah, I admit that they have quite a good cast. Julia Robert is a likable actor and Javier Bardem is good on most movie that he’s in. The scenery and camera work are also quite good. But there is one big problem.

The protagonist is unlikable.

Now, I understand that there are many people who suffer a lot of trouble that Lizz has. But for me she’s pretty selfish, stubborn, and impossible to satisfy from the beginning. At start, she divorce her husband(Billy Crudup) for reason that he was boring blabbing husband. It’s only get worst from that point on because of bad screenplay. The dialog are bland and transition between each scenes are very abrupt. I think understand her a bit but I don’t feel any empathy on her at all.

In fact, ‘EMPTY’ is the word that summarize my feeling about this movie. It might be better if this is make as a miniseries where we can have time to absorb on character thought. But the bad screenplay and trashy dialog from hipster wannabe make the film dry and tasteless.

Do not waste your time with this movie. Just go out and do something. Eat at some good restaurant. Hang out with friend. Do some yoga. Join meditation class. Time is too precious and you should not spend 140 minutes of your life with this piece of eye candy garbage.

1/5 for scenery and shot of yummy spaghetti. I couldn’t rate more for Julia Robert’s free travel ticket.

Bond retrospective: Part 1 – The film.

Bond retrospective: Part 1 – The film.
It was in 1952 in Jamaica. A man was sitting idle on his balcony. His eyes were cold and relentless. He looked at a martini glass in his hand and ponders on his life. His life is changing. The world was trembling with a cold war. The dominance of Great Britain is shaken as the power struggle between the American and Russian goes on.

And worst of it all. He’s getting married.

It’s not that he don’t know how to handle stress. The war time teach him well. But this was something else. His adventure days are soon to be over. No more thrilled and excitement of war. No more days of meeting and gasping of pleasure from beauty of London. He’s going to be just another retired British spy.

He can’t handle it.

He needs some escape.

So he finished his drink and went to his private study and write. The book was finish in 1953. His wife hates it but it sells pretty well.

The book is called ‘Casino Royale’.


==

Well, the new James Bond film is coming up pretty soon. As a long time James Bond fan, I’m pretty excited about it. But as month comes by and spy movie came in and out, we have a good deconstruction film like ‘Spy’ or even Bond-ish film than Skyfall like ‘Kingsmen’. I began to question something to myself?

“What will become of James Bond film?”

While ‘James Bonds will return’ until MGM become bankrupt, I still think it might be a good idea to reflex on what James Bond really is. When I was a kid he was kind of a guy I like to be. But when I grow older and ‘Casino Royale’ came by, my perspective began to change. Bond is no longer a hero I thought he was. As I watch the old film my question begins to grow. Is he a classic gentleman hero? Is he man who sees woman only as sexual object or he was only keeps them out of his life so that they can be safe? Is he British patriot or he just a guy who traps in his job?

Or the most important: “Is he the world hero or just British’s?”

So I decide to sit down and write something a bit for myself. A reflection of my part-time study on the history of James Bond.

While I did not read all the books and some of my information might be inaccurate, I hope that you might get something from it. 

But first, let get back in time.

===

The tough beginning
Ian Fleming writes Casino Royale, the first James Bond book, in 1953. Like any good book nowadays, Casino Royale license was bought immediately by CBS in 1954 for  one hour TV series. At that time, Americans were not ready for British anti-hero that Daniel Craig portray today. So CBS decided to make the most Americanized Bond ever. James Bond became CIA agent ‘Jimmy’ Bond who was play by…..Willie Nelson.
Suffice to say that it’s not accurate adaptation. 

Barry Nelson as ‘Jimmy’ Bond.


For some reason, Fleming also sold Casino Royale license to another studio in 1954 which complete 1968. This time it’s a parody. And as for the accuracy of the film………………….

The word inaccurately can’t even describe it.

Seriously, this is not from Austin Power. 
The day Bond became an icon.
Fortunately, a guy name Harry Saltzman got another license from Fleming. He partner up with Albert R. Broccoli for another adaptation. This time they got publish by United Artist. Unlike other adaptation, the main lead was no name whose only work is in commercial. Ian Fleming even unimpressed with the guy.

The name of that guy was Sean Connery

The film name was Dr. No.

Surprisingly, Dr No becomes a smashing hit. With the subsequent success of ‘from Russia with Love’ and ‘Goldfinger, Connery change Bond perception from Cold sadist British Spy to charming Womanizer superspy we’ know today.

 

The one that start it all.

Six shade of Bond
As years gone by and actors came in and out of role, each one gave their unique taste.

Sean Connery’s Bond was a charming dangerous secret agent who throw woman around like a toilet paper.  Sexist role models that people that people love even on this very day.

The adventurer

George Lazenby, with only film he made, was Connery clone with less sexism and sentimental heart for his tragic wife.
The tragic hero

Roger Moore’s was a satanic playboy who casually toss bad guy down the cliff while making a fool of himself.

The genius fool.
Timothy Dalton’s was Daniel Craig’s prototype, dry angry man who hated his job and look down upon woman. Yet, despite his brooding nature, he’s loyal to his friend and some sentimental spot for his girl.
The impulse.

Pierce Brosnan’s was a boy with toys who have the best trait of all four. He has muscularity of Connery with Moore’s comedic line along with Dalton’s ruthlessness and Lazenby’s vulnerability for pretty broken bird.

The charmer.

Daniel Craig’s Bond was considered to be the closest to Ian Fleming’s James Bond. A sad man who hide his sadness beneath his cold and ruthless exterior.
The blunt instrument.


As you can see Bond’s concept have change by the time. After all these year did original Bond finally come back? But how much each new film closes to the original source? What did the original Bond looks like anyway? People forgot him for ages until Daniel Craig came up.

Is it really matter? Does it worth at all that we try to get Bond’s character back to original?

We can only know these answers by the looking at the source material, and the man who start it all.

Ian Fleming.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑